• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

California v. U.S. Postal Service

Filing Date: 2022
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
Principal Laws:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Description: Lawsuit alleging that the U.S. Postal Service failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act in connection with the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles program to replace its fleet.
  • California v. U.S. Postal Service
    Docket number(s): 3:22-cv-02583
    Court/Admin Entity: N.D. Cal.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    04/28/2022 Complaint Download Complaint filed. NEPA Lawsuit Challenged Postal Service Plan for New Vehicle Fleet. Sixteen states, the District of Columbia, New York City, and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District filed a lawsuit in federal district court in the Northern District of California alleging that the U.S. Postal Service failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in connection with its Next Generation Delivery Vehicles program, which would replace the Postal Service’s fleet with up to 90% internal combustion vehicles and at least 10% electric vehicles. The plaintiffs alleged that the Postal Service violated NEPA by awarding a contract and issuing a task order prior to initiating the NEPA review. They also asserted that the Postal Service failed to analyze reasonable alternatives and failed to take a hard look at environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions. The state plaintiffs also alleged that the Postal Service failed to consider its plan’s inconsistencies with state and local laws and plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel consumption and to electrify the transportation sector.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.