• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

California Trucking Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District

Filing Date: 2021
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • Industry Lawsuits
  • Constitutional Claims
    • Other Constitutional Claims
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Clean Air Act
      • Industry Lawsuits
        • Other Regulation
Principal Laws:
Clean Air Act (CAA), Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994, Supremacy Clause, California Constitution, California Health and Safety Code
Description: Lawsuit seeking to block implementation of a South Coast Air Quality Management District rule imposing compliance obligations on warehouses based on the number, type, and emission characteristics of trucks that visit the warehouse facilities.
  • California Trucking Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
    Docket number(s): 2:21-cv-06341
    Court/Admin Entity: C.D. Cal.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    01/14/2022 Complaint Download Complaint in intervention filed by Airlines for America.
    10/28/2021 Motion to Intervene Download Memorandum of points and authorities filed in support of East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice et al.'s unopposed motion to intervene.
    08/05/2021 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Lawsuit Alleged that Air Quality Management District’s Rule Was Unlawful Regulation of Truck Emissions. California Trucking Association (CTA) filed a lawsuit in federal court in California seeking to block implementation of a rule adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). CTA alleged the rule was intended “to control mobile source emissions by imposing preempted [zero emission or near zero emission (ZE/NZE)] emissions standards on medium to heavy-duty trucks used at warehouses, backed by the threat of economic sanctions styled as a mitigation fee.” The complaint alleged that the rule imposed compliance obligations on warehouses based on the number, type, and emission characteristics of trucks that visit the warehouse facilities. CTA said SCAQMD had styled the rule as a lawful indirect source review rule but that it was “not truly concerned with indirect sources” such as vehicle trips by workers traveling to and from warehouse, construction equipment used to construct new warehouses, or direct emissions from warehouses. Instead, CTA alleged, the rule was “entirely about the trucks” and was therefore preempted by the Clean Air Act and the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994. CTA also alleged that the rule violated state air laws and constituted an unlawful tax.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.