• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Brentwood Stakeholders Alliance for Better Living v. City of Los Angeles

Filing Date: 2014
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Description: Challenge to approvals for condo building in Los Angeles.
  • Brentwood Stakeholders Alliance for Better Living v. City of Los Angeles
    Docket number(s): B263037
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    04/26/2016 Opinion Download Opinion issued. California Appellate Court Upheld CEQA Review for Condo Building in Los Angeles. In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal upheld approvals granted by the City of Los Angeles for a six-story building with 49 condominium units. The appellate court concluded that the City had complied with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The parties that challenged the CEQA review had contended that the greenhouse gas study commissioned by the developer did not analyze greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources and construction, and that the mitigated negative declaration for the project did not address greenhouse gas emission impacts. The appellate court said that the study had considered both stationary and mobile source emissions and had indicated that the project’s emissions would be below the significance thresholds proposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The court also found that the plaintiffs had not cited substantial evidence to support the argument that greenhouse gas mitigation measures were inadequate, or that there would be a significant impact.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.