• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Avista Corp. v. Bellon

Filing Date: 2016
Case Categories:
  • Constitutional Claims
    • Commerce Clause
Principal Laws:
Commerce Clause
Description: Challenge by utilities and local distribution company to greenhouse gas regulations adopted by Washington Department of Ecology.
  • Avista Corp. v. Bellon
    Docket number(s): 2:16-cv-00335
    Court/Admin Entity: E.D. Wash.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    10/26/2016 Order Download Order issued granting stipulated motion to stay. The court granted the parties' motion to hold the case in abeyance while awaiting final resolution of one or both of two cases pending in Washington state court (Avista Corp. v. Washington State Department of Ecology, No. 16-2-03966-34 (Wash. Super. Ct), and Association of Washington Business v. Washington State Department of Ecology, No. 16-2-03923-34 (Wash. Super. Ct.)).
    09/27/2016 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Utilities and Natural Gas Distribution Companies Filed Commerce Clause Challenge to Washington Greenhouse Gas Regulations. Electric utilities and natural gas local distribution companies filed an action in the federal district court for the Eastern District of Washington challenging greenhouse gas emission regulations known as the “Clean Air Rule” adopted by the Washington State Department of Ecology. The plaintiffs asserted that the regulations—which apply to stationary sources, natural gas distributors located in Washington, and petroleum product producers located in or importing to Washington—violated the Commerce Clause because it establishes a program that restricts the market for greenhouse gas emissions offsets and favors in-state offsets over out-of-state offsets.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.