Description: Challenge to drilling permits.
-
Association of Irritated Residents v. California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, & Geothermal Resources
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 04/08/2020 Opinion Download Trial court denial of petition for writ of mandate affirmed. California Appellate Court Said Approval of Permits to Drill Was Ministerial, Did Not Require CEQA Review. The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s determination that California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review was not required for the issuance of certain permits to drill by the Division of Oil, Gas, & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) of the California Department of Conservation because DOGGR’s approvals in this case were ministerial in nature. The petitioners had alleged that the agency failed to consider the cumulative impacts of the permits, including the release of greenhouse gases. The appellate court concluded that “[a]lthough some statutory provisions and regulations reflect that, under other circumstances, DOGGR would ordinarily exercise discretion in making well drilling permit decisions, that was not the case here.” In the “limited and narrow circumstances” of this case, the appellate court found that DOGGR had not exercise discretionary judgment or deliberation “but merely determined in a mechanical fashion whether there was conformity with applicable standards set forth in the regulations and … field rules.” -
Association of Irritated Residents v. California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 11/12/2014 Petition for Writ of Mandate Download Petition for writ of mandate filed. Environmental organizations filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court challenging drilling permits issued by the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) of the California Department of Conservation. Petitioners alleged that DOGGR had issued at least 214 individual permits for drilling in the South Belridge Oil Field since July 29, 2014, without completing the review required under the California Environmental Quality Act. Petitioners contended that DOGGR had failed to consider the cumulative impacts of the permits, including the release of greenhouse gases.