• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Home
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • About
  • Contact

AquAlliance v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Filing Date: 2020
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
  • Public Trust Claims
Principal Laws:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Public Trust Doctrine, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Description: Challenge to environmental review and approval of a 2019-2024 water transfer program for the sale of water by sellers upstream of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to buyers south of the Delta.
  • AquAlliance v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
    Docket number(s): 2:20-cv-00959
    Court/Admin Entity: E.D. Cal.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    05/11/2020 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Plaintiffs Said Environmental Review for California Water Transfer Program Was Insufficient. California water resource management and conservation organizations filed a lawsuit challenging the environmental review and approval of a 2019-2024 water transfer program for the sale of water by sellers upstream of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to buyers south of the Delta. The plaintiffs alleged the project would likely have “devastating impacts to the Delta,” reducing freshwater flows and worsening existing problems of inadequate water supplies, instream flow deficits, water quality impairments, and degraded aquatic habitats. The plaintiffs alleged that an EIS prepared after the court previously vacated a similar water transfer program was still deficient. Among the alleged deficiencies in the new EIS was a failure to include sufficient information about climate change. The complaint alleged that the project would exacerbate climate change’s impacts on groundwater resources. The plaintiffs asserted claims under NEPA, the California Environmental Quality Act, and the public trust doctrine.

© 2021 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

These materials are intended to be a useful resource and may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. They are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.OkColumbia University Website Cookie Notice