• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Bernhardt

Filing Date: 2019
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes
Principal Laws:
Endangered Species Act (ESA), Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Description: Challenge to revisions to Endangered Species Act regulations.
  • Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Bernhardt
    Docket number(s): 4:19-cv-06812
    Court/Admin Entity: N.D. Cal.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/28/2022 Motion Download Joint motion to alter or amend order and judgment filed by plaintiffs. The plaintiffs, who had requested vacatur, asked the court to amend or alter the judgment to resolve on the merits the issue of whether the FWS and NMFS failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when they promulgated the 2019 regulations. The plaintiffs said a ruling that the FWS and NMFS violated NEPA would make vacatur the standard remedy and ensure that the regulations were not reinstated, which would be an “unjust result.”
    07/25/2022 Opposition Download Joint opposition filed by plaintiffs to defendant-intervenors' motion for expedited decision on motion for stay pending appeal.
    07/21/2022 Motion Download Joint time-sensitive motion to stay pending appeal filed by intervenors. Intervenors Appealed and Sought Stay. Three sets of intervenors appealed: private landowner intervenors, 13 states led by Alabama, and industry intervenors including the American Farm Bureau Federation, American Forest Resource Council, and American Petroleum Institute. Intervenors also moved for stay of the vacatur, arguing that the Supreme Court’s April 2022 order staying a district court’s vacatur of another regulation (concerning state water quality certifications under the Clean Water Act) called the district court’s authority to vacate the regulations with out reaching the merits into question.
    07/21/2022 Motion Download Joint motion for expedited consideration without oral argument on motion for stay pending appeal filed by intervenors.
    07/21/2022 Notice of Appeal Download Notice of appeal filed by private landowners.
    07/21/2022 Notice of Appeal Download Notice of appeal filed by defendant-intervenor states.
    07/21/2022 Notice of Appeal Download Notice of appeal filed by industry intervenors.
    07/05/2022 Order Download Case remanded and regulations vacated. Federal Court Vacated Trump-Era Endangered Species Act Regulations; Intervenors Appealed and Sought Stay. The federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated and remanded the 2019 revisions to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) regulations after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) indicated they had substantial concerns with the amended regulations and said they intended to propose revisions. (The federal defendants had requested voluntary remand without vacatur.) The challenged regulations included a revised definition of “foreseeable future” that provided that “foreseeable future” extends “only so far into the future as the Services can reasonably determine that both the future threats and the species’ responses to those threats are likely.” The complaint alleged that this requirement that threats be “likely” “increased the level of certainty required to protect species, contravening Congress’s intent to ‘give the benefit of the doubt to the species’” and that “[t]he consequence of imposing this increased certainty requirement is that species facing extinction from the impacts of climate change or other future events involving prediction and uncertainty will improperly be deprived of protection until after it is too late to prevent their extinction, violating the ESA’s command to use the best available science.”
    03/14/2022 Response Download Joint response filed by plaintiffs to federal defendants' supplemental brief re motion for remand without vacatur.
    03/12/2022 Brief Download Supplemental brief re defendants' motion for voluntary remand filed by industry defendant-intervenors.
    03/12/2022 Brief Download Supplemental brief re federal defendants' motion for voluntary remand filed by private landowner intervenors.
    03/12/2022 Brief Download Supplemental brief re: federal defendants' motion for voluntary remand without vacatur filed by state intervenors.
    03/04/2022 Brief Download Federal defendants filed supplemental brief in support of federal defendants' motion for voluntary remand and response to plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment.
    01/03/2022 Reply Download Reply filed by federal defendants in support of motion for voluntary remand.
    12/27/2021 Opposition Download Private landowner intervenors filed partial opposition to motion for remand.
    12/27/2021 Response Download Industry defendant-intervenors filed response to motion for voluntary remand.
    12/27/2021 Response Download State intervenors filed response to motion for voluntary remand without vacatur.
    12/23/2021 Opposition Download Plaintiffs filed joint opposition to motion for voluntary remand without vacatur.
    12/10/2021 Motion Download Federal defendants filed motion for voluntary remand and response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
    10/15/2021 Motion for Summary Judgment Download Re-filed motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs.
    10/07/2021 Order Defendants' motion to stay denied.
    08/13/2021 Motion Download Motion to stay filed by federal defendants.
    08/02/2021 Order Order issued administratively terminating motions for summary judgment.
    04/19/2021 Order Download Stay of proceedings continued for an additional 60 days, with a joint status report due no later than June 18, 2021.
    02/16/2021 Order Download Joint stipulation to stay proceedings for 60 days so-ordered.
    06/08/2020 Complaint Download First amended complaint filed.
    05/18/2020 Order Download Motion to dismiss granted with leave to file amended complaint within 21 days. The court found that the organizational plaintiff had not demonstrated injury-in-fact to its members or that it suffered direct injury.
    05/18/2020 Order Download Motions to intervene granted.
    01/24/2020 Reply Download Reply filed in support of federal defendants' motion to dismiss.
    01/21/2020 Statement Download Statement of nonopposition to states' motion to intervene filed by Animal Legal Defense Fund.
    01/07/2020 Motion to Intervene Download Motion to intervene as defendants filed by 13 states.
    01/07/2020 Opposition Download Opposition filed by Animal Legal Defense Fund to defendants' motion to dismiss.
    12/27/2019 Statement Download Statement of nonopposition to motions to intervene filed by Animal Legal Defense Fund.
    12/17/2019 Motion to Intervene Download Motion to intervene filed by Kenneth Klemm, Beaver Creek Buffalo Co., Washington Cattlemen’s Association, and Pacific Legal Foundation.
    12/06/2019 Motion to Dismiss Download Motion to dismiss filed by federal defendants.
    10/21/2019 Complaint Download Complaint filed.

© 2022 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.