• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Alliance of the Southeast v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Filing Date: 2023
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Clean Water Act
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal Laws:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Public Trust Doctrine, Water Resources Development Act, Illinois Public Act
Description: Challenge to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval of the Calumet Harbor Dredged Material Disposal Facility, which would enable continued disposal of dredged materials from Chicago Area Waterway System.
  • Alliance of the Southeast v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    Docket number(s): 1:23-cv-01524
    Court/Admin Entity: N.D. Ill.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    03/13/2023 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Lawsuit in Illinois Federal Court Challenged Dredged Material Disposal Facility on Lake Michigan. Two groups representing southeast Chicago communities filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois challenging U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval of the Calumet Harbor Dredged Material Disposal Facility (DMDF), which would enable continued disposal of dredged materials from the Chicago Area Waterway System atop the existing 45-acree Confined Disposal Facility (CDF). The plaintiffs alleged that the CDF is located on submerged Lake Michigan lakebed, which the State of Illinois holds in public trust. The complaint alleged that the Corps had used the CDF for disposal of dredged material for almost 40 years, despite a statutory requirement that it be converted into a public park after no more than 10 years of use as a disposal facility. The plaintiffs assert that approval of the Calumet Harbor DMDF violated NEPA, the Clean Water Act, and statutory requirements for establishing dredged material disposal facilities, as well as the Illinois Public Act and the Illinois public trust doctrine. The NEPA claims involve allegations that the Corps assumed “no additional cost resulting from higher water levels and more intensive storms driven by climate change and other factors along the Lake Michigan lakeshore” and that the EIS “did not fully and fairly evaluate and take the required hard look at the impacts of climate change” with regard to the project.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.