16 Cases found

RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA

Filing Date: 2022
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Case held in abeyance. [ 03/14/2022 ]
Description: Challenge to EPA's 2022 allowance allocations for hydrofluorocarbons under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020.

California Trucking Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District

Filing Date: 2021
Court/Admin Entity: C.D. Cal.
Status: Complaint in intervention filed by Airlines for America. [ 01/14/2022 ]
Description: Lawsuit seeking to block implementation of a South Coast Air Quality Management District rule imposing compliance obligations on warehouses based on the number, type, and emission characteristics of trucks that visit the warehouse facilities.

Heating, Air-Conditioning, & Refrigeration Distributors International v. EPA

Filing Date: 2021
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Reply brief filed by petitioners Heating, Air-Conditioning, & Refrigeration Distributors International et al. [ 07/08/2022 ]
Description: Challenges to EPA's final rule on “Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Establishing the Allowance Allocation and Trading Program under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act.”

RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA

Filing Date: 2021
Court/Admin Entity: 11th Cir.
Status: Ordered that venue issue is "carried with the case" to be determined by merits panel. [ 04/01/2022 ]
Description: Challenge to EPA's 2022 allowance allocations for hydrofluorocarbons under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020.

Mexichem Fluor, Inc. v. EPA

Filing Date: 2017
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Petitions for review granted. [ 04/05/2019 ]
Description: Challenge to 2016 rule expanding the scope of 2015 regulations that classified hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and HFC blends as unacceptable for certain uses pursuant to the Significant New Alternatives Program (SNAP) under Clean Air Act Section 612.

National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. EPA

Filing Date: 2017
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Status report filed by EPA. [ 11/16/2020 ]
Description: Challenge to issues raised by petitioners in administrative petitions for reconsideration of 2020 revisions to refrigerant management rules (severed from 2017 proceeding challenging the 2016 rule revised by the 2020 rule (Nos. 17-1016 and 17-1017)).

National Waste & Recycling Association v. EPA

Filing Date: 2016
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Federal defendants filed joinder in intervenor-defendants' expedited motion for stay. [ 08/11/2021 ]
Description: Challenge to emission guidelines for municipal solid waste landfills.

North Dakota v. EPA

Filing Date: 2016
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Motion filed by petitioners to govern further proceedings. [ 10/21/2016 ]
Description: Challenge to oil and gas sector methane emission standards.

Mexichem Fluor, Inc. v. EPA

Filing Date: 2015
Court/Admin Entity: U.S.
Status: Certiorari denied. [ 10/09/2018 ]
Description: Challenge to prohibitions and restrictions on use of certain hydrofluorocarbons in Significant New Alternatives Policy program.

American Petroleum Institute v. EPA

Filing Date: 2013
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Request to hold cases in abeyance granted. [ 05/18/2017 ]
Description: Challenge to new source performance standards for oil and gas sector.

Honeywell International, Inc. v. EPA

Filing Date: 2010
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Opinion issued denying petitions for review. [ 01/22/2013 ]
Description: Challenge to agency’s approval of transfers of allowances for production and use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons.

Arkema, Inc. v. EPA

Filing Date: 2009
Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
Status: Opinion issued. [ 08/27/2010 ]
Description: Challenge to rule in EPA’s cap- and-trade program for ozone depleting substances.

Sunflower Electric Power Corp. v. Kansas Department of Health & Environment

Filing Date: 2007
Court/Admin Entity: Kan. Dist. Ct.
Status: Proceedings dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [ 07/15/2008 ]
Description: Challenge to denial of permits for construction of coal-fired generators at power plant in southwest Kansas, which were denied based on concerns about emerging information about the contribution of greenhouse gases to climate change.